|
This
week WildLink students were asked to imagine that all of the
country’s wilderness areas were in jeopardy of being developed;
Congress is locked in a tie and the person who will cast the
deciding vote is undecided. Each student has an exclusive audience
with this person in order to sway his/her vote in the direction
they believe is right. What would they say?
I
believe that all wilderness should be safe and the reason being
is that just imagine how ugly this world would be if we didn’t
have a source of wild things. For example the population of
the cars and stuff that hurt the people would increase, which
means that more people would get diseases and die. Why? Well
because there is no clean air and besides the women that are
pregnant they have more chances for their not born child to
get some type of sickness and be bon with a defect. If there
wasn’t any forest or wilderness many people would lose
their jobs as well as them losing the love they have towards
the wild and not just that but animals would lose their home.
Do you think that there would be more wild animals? Well there
wouldn’t because they don’t have a home and they
would get killed, if it wasn’t for the wilderness they
would be dead by now and I really don‘t want for my parents
or anyone else to die because there isn’t any clean air
or for the people and animals to lose their job or home. The
wilderness is something really pretty that has history and other
people who aren’t protecting it don’t really know
how beautiful the wild really is. The wilderness is peoples’
home, peoples’ jobs and peoples’ love therefore
I am so protecting the forest.

|